Table 1 |
||
|
Origin and derivation of the telomere clones used in the study. |
||
| Clone |
Chrom |
Supplier |
|
|
||
| 1186B18 |
3p |
Flint |
| 196F04 |
3q |
Incyte |
| 36P21 |
4p |
Incyte |
| 963K6 |
4q |
Flint |
| 189N21 |
5p |
Incyte |
| 240G13 |
5q |
Incyte |
| 62I11 |
6p |
Incyte |
| 57H24 |
6q |
Incyte |
| 164D18 |
7p |
Incyte |
| 3K23 |
7q |
Incyte |
| 43N06 |
9p |
Incyte |
| 112N13 |
9q |
Incyte |
| 306F07 |
10p |
Incyte |
| 137E24 |
10q |
Incyte |
| 496A11 |
12p |
Flint |
| 221K18 |
12q |
Incyte |
| 2111b1 |
17p |
ATCC |
| 362K4 |
17q |
Flint |
| 52M11 |
18p |
ATCC |
| 964M9 |
18q |
Flint |
| 1061L1 |
20p |
Flint |
| 81F12 |
20q |
Incyte |
|
Note: The host strain was E. coli DH10B with kanamycin resistance in all cases except the clone 2111b1 (17p probe) which was ampicillin resistant. | ||
Daniel and St Heaps Cell & Chromosome 2004 3:3 doi:10.1186/1475-9268-3-3 |
||
